See how IQ Auto evaluates inspection quality across different scenarios
Customer: Sarah Johnson • 62,000 miles
Excellent inspection quality. All flagged items are well-documented with measurements, photos, and clear explanations. Safety priorities are appropriate. No concerning patterns detected.
Customer: Michael Chen • 89,000 miles
Good inspection quality with minor documentation gaps. Main issues are missing measurements for brake pads and unclear photo for cabin air filter. These small improvements would move this to an A grade.
Customer: David Martinez • 128,000 miles
Fair inspection quality with concerning inconsistencies. Serpentine belt flagged as critical but appears fine in photo - needs better documentation or correction. Missing photos and measurements reduce customer confidence.
Customer: Lisa Anderson • 35,000 miles
Poor inspection quality with significant concerns about over-flagging. Multiple maintenance items recommended on low-mileage vehicle without clear justification. Pattern suggests possible revenue focus over customer need. Recommend technician review.
Customer: Robert Taylor • 18,000 miles
FAILING INSPECTION - IMMEDIATE ACTION REQUIRED. Multiple critical errors recommending services for non-existent components on electric vehicle. This appears to be a template-based inspection without vehicle-specific knowledge. Risk of customer complaint, negative review, and potential fraud allegation is extremely high. Recommend immediate technician retraining and process review.
These are sample audits demonstrating IQ Auto's capabilities
Start Your Free Trial